Why we have 3 dogs.
At some point a household stops having pets and starts operating a small, emotionally manipulative nonprofit.
2026-04-14 · 6 min
We have 3 dogs because at some point common sense lost a close vote.
There was probably a meeting. I was not invited.
The dogs were.
Sophie, Henry, and Lulu have turned our home into a small, emotionally manipulative nonprofit with fur on the furniture and a complex internal governance model. Their mission is unclear but well funded. Their operating rhythm includes breakfast, inspection of the perimeter, nap, second nap, moral objection to the mail, dinner, and evening theater.
Evening theater is when one of them pretends they have never been fed.
They are very good at it.
Three dogs changes the physics of a house. One dog is a companion. Two dogs are a bit. Three dogs are an ecosystem. There are alliances, grievances, shifting treaties, border disputes over blankets, and at least one daily incident that requires a human to ask, "Why is this wet?"
A 3-dog house is never fully quiet. Even silence has a suspicious texture.
You learn the sounds. The honest bark. The fake bark. The alert bark. The "a leaf moved with intent" bark. The small clicking of nails on the floor at 2:00 AM, which means someone has remembered a strategic water need. The deep sigh of a dog whose life is apparently harder than yours despite having no job, no rent, and no known position on interest rates.
I love them in ways that are embarrassing to explain.
I have held executive meetings with a dog asleep against my leg and felt the whole tone of the day improve by 12%. I have come home stressed and been greeted like I returned from war rather than Mariano's. I have watched one of them choose the least convenient place in the room to lie down and admired the confidence.
Dogs are funny because they make your importance negotiable.
You can have a serious title, a serious meeting, a serious deck, a serious problem that has somehow grown teeth. Then a dog walks in carrying a sock like classified evidence and the universe resizes itself.
This is useful.
Work has a way of inflating itself until every email feels like weather. Dogs do not care about this. They care about the walk. They care about the window. They care about the small sound near the pantry that might indicate cheese.
They pull you back into the physical world.
A leash. Cold air. A crooked little trot. The ridiculous dignity of a dog investigating a bush as if it contains a legal argument.
There is humility in being responsible for creatures who cannot understand your calendar and do not respect your desire to finish one more thing.
There is also a strange kind of order. The dogs give the day rails. They need food. They need outside. They need attention. They need someone to notice if the limp is real or if the limp is part of a broader snack acquisition strategy.
A house with 3 dogs is messy, expensive, and bad for dark clothing. It is also hard to become too impressed with yourself when you are standing in the yard at night with a plastic bag in your hand, waiting for a small mammal to complete a transaction.
That is probably good for me.
I spend a lot of time thinking about systems, work, AI, markets, strategy, ambition, all the adult machinery that can make life feel abstract if you let it. The dogs refuse abstraction. They are immediate. They are hungry. They are warm against your side. They do not care what anyone thinks of your personal brand, thank God.
They just want you home.
That is the best argument I have.
We have 3 dogs because the house feels more like itself with them in it. Because Kristin and I have apparently accepted a certain level of managed chaos as a lifestyle. Because love is often impractical and then becomes the reason the practical parts matter.
Also because one dog became two, two became three, and by then the dogs had formed a voting bloc.